OrangeRX modules FAQ

Contents

What’s the OrangeRX modules pinout ?

 

orangerx-pinout

How to improve the range?

Some points to check to improve your range :

Replace the UFL (coax cable) of OrangeRX 1W TX modules

Just do it, the provided cables have very often issues (open or short circuit), sometimes immediately and sometimes after several manipulations.

Always replace them by another one, such as this one. One side is a “U.FL” connector, the other side is a SMA connector.
ori-adaptateur-ufl-sma-20893[1]

Solder directly to the RFM23BP module pins

Not mandatory, but can avoid unwanted disconnection of the UFL connector.

Like this :

antenne_03

Or like user “salience” from rcgroups.com :

coaxjob

Use a thicker coax cable

Not mandatory, but if you want to place your antenna a bit further (on the car roof for example), consider using a good and thicker 50 ohms coax cable (RG-58), such as this one :

rg58Choose good antennas

  • The stock antennas of OrangeRX modules seem to be 2.4GHz antennas, and will provide a very low range of a few hundred meters.
  • Don’t use monopole antennas ! Dipoles are usually sufficient, but some users use other antennas such as yagi, patch, moxon, ground plane, etc. 3)
  • Avoid interference sources. Two users who were using bluetooth modules inside or next to the OrangeRX modules have reported lost packets at short range.
  • Have a look here for antennas suggestions

How to increase the power ?

The out-of-the-box power of the “1W” OrangeRX is around 400mW. However their RF module can really achieve 1000mW, with a simple modification described on this page.

How to activate the brown-out detector ?

Please see this page for information about the brown-out detector on the OrangeRX modules.

Other issues

RF connector shorting the RFM module pins

A the connector can rotate, it will easily come in contact with the pins, in particular the first one and that’s problematic : The external part of the RF connector is GND, and when it touches the first pin of the module it shortcuts the antenna. It can damage the module, but usually it will survive a short contact. Maybe this can cause a sudden voltage drop and reset of the atmega too. The photos are from two different brand new modules, first opening. Notice that touching the second pin is not an issue, but touching the first (in the corner of the RFM module) is short circuiting the antenna output. On these two modules it seems that the RF connector is on the second pin, but it’s freely rotating and can touch the first one too.

DSC_6540

An option is to use hot glu, another is to cover the RFM23BP pins with tape:

DSC_6535

DSC_6745 2) It also happened that the vibrations (quadcopter) broke on pin of the voltage regulator (see comment below)

How to access the serial port ?

7The serial port is not accessible by default, and requires to cut a hole into the plastic :
DSC_6743 DSC_6747

Remark about the pins RX_ON, TX_ON, RX_ANT, TX_ANT

Just for information for people building their own modules, several users are asking if these pins must be connected differently on the 1W and 100mW modules :

The pins RX_ON and TX_ON on the RFM23BP (1W module) are named differently : RX_ANT and TX_ANT on the RFM22B (100mW module), and are reversed.

But their signals are inverted too :

RX_ANT : Rx Antenna select input pin. When RFM22 is RX state, RX_ANT should be = 1, TX_ANT should be = 0
Rx ON : select input pin. When RFM23BP is RX state, RX_ON should be = 0, TX_ON should be = 1

 

So in conclusion the wiring must be the same for the 1W and the 100mW modules. It took me several burned modules before understanding this…

50 comments

  1. seaowl says:

    Hi! maybe someone knows what is “RF” pin at OrangeRX TX 1W module PPM-connector? It goes to R2.

  2. tomerinbar1 says:

    There is any different between Futaba and JR modules except pin-outs?
    Because HK doesn’t restock the Futaba compatible module and I thought I can purchase the JR instead.
    I’ve own a Futaba 7C 2.4Ghz transmitter and I’ve to hook it up directly to the board anyway.
    Will the JR module will work?

    Thank’s

  3. j_keiter says:

    Can someone explain what the receiver module is in this HobbyKing listing. Is this the receiver that goes in the plane. If so where are the servo plug sockets or serial port?
    Thanks Jason
    https://hobbyking.com/en_us/orangerx-openlrsng-433mhz-tx-module-and-receiver-combo-w-bluetooth.html

  4. Arthur says:

    Hi,
    HobbyKing currently advertises some 1W OrangeRX Receivers, but the description is somewhat misleading, stating RFM22 module.
    Are those really 1W modules? That form factor would be more convenient to use on the model than the bulkier TX module.

  5. Goetz says:

    1W-Modules are in HK-Stock again! 🙂

  6. Ben says:

    Hi there.
    Firstly, fantastic software/firmware.
    I’m currently having a new wolfbox 1w checked out as I think a dodgy shipped antenna may have fried the output. Am I correct in thinking that this runs a RF23b module and can this simply be changed out with a new module, if indeed the transmitter output has been fried? Thanks in advance

    • admin says:

      Hi, the exact reference for the 1W module is an RFM23BP and the 100mW uses an RFM22B. (RF23B is a different chip)

      • Ben says:

        My apologies, you are absolutely right. It was the RFM23BP I should have referred to. Therefore if the output stage is fried is it a case of replacing the RFM23BP and reflashing the firmware. Thankyou

  7. Bedirhan says:

    Are these two models identical? If i set up the ports, can i use futaba version on the Taranis Controller?

  8. Christian says:

    Just a few questions regarding security of the ULRS firmware:

    Are there any measures against hijacking of the RF link? Is there any kind of binding? Or will every ULRS module talk to every other ULRS module?

    Are there any measures against damaged packets on the RF link? Is there any kind of checksum? Are damaged packets discarded?

    • admin says:

      Hi Christian,

      The 2.25 beta version will include AES-128 authentication and encryption.

      The current beta version 2.24 uses a simple binding, so it won’t accept messages from any other module around. In addition the protocol used and the packets structure are not public. The system is using frequency hopping, and the time spent on every channel is variable and impossible to guess for an external observer. All traffic is CRC validated (at the packet level and at the message level) and any damaged packet is discarded. So it’s secure, nothing similar to the drones that can be hacked with a wireless wifi stick. But the version designed for complete security will be the beta 2.25.

      • Riccardo Spagni says:

        Hi – is the encryption idea still possible, or are you leaving it for a later release?

        • admin says:

          We’re at the limits of the current hardware, but the Ultimate LRS Teensy will maybe include encryption.

  9. DVRS says:

    Hello, I’am running OpenTX with mavlink ext. and trying to get data displayed with ULRS – OrangeRX Tx 100mW and Rx 100mW. Found several HW mods but not sure which one will work, could do a try-out but maybe someone already has found a good HW modding solution?

    • admin says:

      Hello, notice that a 100mW TX – 100 mW RX is not supported, because it offers a limited range. I recommend to use 1W TX and 1W RX, even if 1W TX with 100mW RX is supported in the 1.06 version. Notice that the 1W from Hobbyking only provides around 400mW. You can find a mod to upgrade it to 1W in the FAQ page on this site.

      • feket663 says:

        Hi! I plan using the UltimateLRS on quadcopter for not too large distance. I think, for me enough the limited range. There is some obstackle using the 100 mW TX module? If I know right, the RFM22B and RFM23BP are similar, only the RFM23BP have an discrete amplifier on output.

        • admin says:

          I’m finalizing the 100mW support in the firmware in a few days.
          The RFM23 and RFM22 modules have the same pinout, but their connections to the OrangeRX 100mW and 1W modules are different, that’s why the firmware has to be adapted.

          (Notice that you can in the meanwhile replace the RFM23 of a 1W OrangeRX module by a RFM22 module if you want less power.)

  10. Sharon says:

    I’m trying to have a bidirectional link between two orange rx (433MHZ, 100MW). However, when I am sending data through the serial port I can not see the data on the other serial port of the second orange rx.
    What I’m doing wrong ?

    • admin says:

      Ultimate LRS doesn’t support two 100mW modules, are you using another firmware ?
      With Ultimate LRS you’ll see whatever you type on one side, on the other side of the link.

      • Sharon says:

        Thanks for your response.
        I’ve to tell you that I used two 100mW and it was working well, until something happened and I’m not sure what and why you ask to use one of them 1W ?

        Sharon

        • admin says:

          Normally the firmware only supports 1W TX, and 100mW or 1W RX. I don’t see how it can have worked with 2 x 100mW, because the pinout is different ? Are you sure it was with ULRS firmware ?

  11. Owen Bayona says:

    It is a fully user-customizable RF transmitter system. Open LRS TX Module a very versatile unit perfect for your custom projects.

  12. joseph douce says:

    Might get away with not using a switching regulator.

    • admin says:

      What you can do is to power the RFM23BP module directly from the ESC (5 to 6V), and let the rest of the circuit be powered by the OrangeRX 3.3V regulator.

      If you want to avoid a switching regulator, be careful that linear regulators such as 7833 need a certain voltage drop which can be superior to 5V-3.3V = 1.7V. There are other similar linear regulator with low voltage drop.

      • joseph douce says:

        my problem is the regulator on the orangerx board is broken, not sure when or why but its only giving 0.8v on the output. the rest of the module is fine I jumped out the regulator and supplied 3.3v and it is working perfectly… but … the 3.3v is from my bench supply. I will try a LD117AV33

  13. joseph douce says:

    Looks like I’d better buy another regulator then. Thanks

  14. joseph douce says:

    Are you sure the RFM23BP is only 3.3v tolerant on the IO’s datasheet says 3.3-6v and I can’t see anywhere them specifying 3.3v on the IO’s , just says VDD +/- 0.3v, page 10, reason I asked is the regulator on one of my modules seems to be fried, only producing 1v on the output, has anyone tested it at 5v for prolonged use? I have currently just bridged the regulator, so I will let you know when/if it dies.

    • admin says:

      Hi Joseph, that’s a point that I checked directly with the manufacturer, after having fried several modules. Some of them stopped working at all, some others had some specific pins which stopped working, another module lost a lot of RF power. And some others had no other issues than overheating and consuming too much current.

      De: “Candy”
      Envoyé: lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:46
      A: “benoit”
      Objet: Fw: RFM23BP question

      Dear Benoit,

      Thanks for your email.

      Would you kindly share more information about your company and the application?
      How about the forecast?

      May I know when and where you bought the samples from?

      RFM23BP is a module combined with RFM23B and power amplifier.
      5V power is for amplifier.
      So operated power of chip is 3.3V, and the power of the ports which communicate with MCU is also 3.3V.
      It means the voltage of the communication pins is 3.3V.

      We have many new products with good performance and low price.
      Enclosed with the products list for your reference.

      Best Regards,
      Candy Liu
      ——————————————————————————-
      Hope Microelectronics Co., Ltd.

      2/F Building 3, Pingshan Private Enterprise Science & Technology Park,
      Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518057, China

      Mailbox: euro@hoperf.com
      Websit: http://www.hoperf.com

      • Sharon says:

        Hi,

        It seems that I fried one too, since it stop working.
        How can I know for sure and How can I fix it ?

        Thanks,
        Sharon

      • Ruben Verhoef says:

        So that means the datasheet is lying..
        acording to the datasheet:
        Logic High Level Input Voltage VIH min VDD – 0.6V
        Logic Low Level Input Voltage VIL max 0.6 V
        MAX:
        VDD to GND –0.3, +8.3 V
        Voltage on Digital Control Inputs –0.3, VDD + 0.3 V
        See:

        • admin says:

          Yes the datasheet is misleading. I checked directly with the chip manufacturer who confirmed the 3.3V level on digital pins (see OrangeRX FAQ page).

  15. JoeRockhead says:

    One more question about the ULRS power. Can the atmega take 5.5v or 6v power? It would be cleaner to split a single 6v bec into both the agmega and RFM. Thx

    • admin says:

      That’s a good question, the ATMEGA can handle that voltage, and it would actually be better for it as it runs at 16 MHz (running it at 16 MHz under 3.3V is not within its specs). But the RFM22 / RFM23 requires 3.3V (max 3.6V) on its IO pins. This point is not clear even on its datasheet, but I checked it with the chip manufacturer. Also you can see the IO pins traces are directly connected to a 3.3V chip on the RFM module (SI4432 or similar).

      • Shubhankar says:

        today i programmed the orange lrs with 5v ftdi(bymistake….forgot to switch it to 3.3v)
        but the board survived no problem till now….. strange…

        • admin says:

          The 1W module is quite resistant to 5V, because it can accept up to 6V (by its specifications). However it’s still bad practice to power it by the serial port, because it powers the atmega to 5V, and so it sends 5V on the IO pins of RFM23BP modules, which are designed for maximum 3.6V. That creates heat and in the long run can destroy the chip.

          The 100 mW is almost immediately killed by 5V, which are completely outside its specifications. The stories of destroyed modules that you can see in the forums are almost all related to the 100 mW modules.

  16. JoeRockhead says:

    If I’m powering my ULRS through the atmega off my 5v BEC, is the RFM23BP powered at 5v or stepped down to 3.3v? Do I still need 5v (or 6v) directly to the RFM23BP? I want to achieve 800mw of power before I run some longer distance tests. I’m not sure if I need 1w(yet). Thx!

    • admin says:

      If you power it from the 5V BEC, all components are powered at 3.3V via the onboard 3.3V regulator. This is fine and gives 400 mW RF power. To have 1W power, cut the VCC trace going to the RFM23BP, and power the RFM from 5.5 to 6V (from the BEC or another supply). The ATMEGA must still be powered at 3.3V

  17. admin says:

    The next release will support DTF UHF, it will also be possible to combine OrangeRX and DTF modules, they both will work as RX or as TX.

Leave a Reply to tomerinbar1 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *